UC Hastings College of the Law Logo
Make Your Gift | Media | A to Z | Contact Us | WebAdvisor | Email
HomeCentersPublic Law Research Institute › Proposition 83

Proposition 83


What is Proposition 83?

Proposition 83 is an initiative passed by California voters in the Nov. 7, 2006 election. Among other provisions, Proposition 83 prohibits registered sex offenders from living within 2,000 feet of a school or park where children gather.

Working Paper

Jodi Schwartzberg & Annie Lo, "The Law and Policy of Sex Offender Residency Restrictions: An Analysis of Proposition 83" (Public Law Research Institute, Fall 2006) summarizes existing empirical research on the effect of residency restrictions, and analyzes the constitutionality of Proposition 83 under the federal and state constitutions.

Report

Marcus Nieto and David Jung, The Impact of Residency Restrictions on Sex Offenders and Correctional Management Practices: A Literature Review ( California Research Bureau, 2006).

Current Litigation

  • California : On Nov. 8, 2006, John Doe, a registered sex offender, challenged Proposition 83 in federal court on the claim that the initiative violated his constitutional rights. On February 9, 2007, Judge Karlton ruled that the Proposition did not apply to the plaintiffs, because they were convicted before the statute's effective date. According to the court, there was insufficient evidence that the statute was intended to apply retroactively. Court filings are online at http://prop83.org .
  • New Jersey: On December 22, 2006, a New Jersey trial court enjoined the operation of a local ordinance prohibiting sex offenders from residing or loitering within 500 feet of a school. Read the court's opinion.

Other resources

Jill S. Levenson, Ph.D. and Leo P. Cotter, The Impact of Sex Offender Residence Restrictions: 1,000 Feet From Danger or One Step From Absurd?

©2010 UC Hastings College of the Law, 200 McAllister, San Francisco, CA 94102
Map/Directions | EmploymentSite Map | Accessibility