Friday, February 15, 2013

Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly Hosts "Patent Pending" Symposium

On February 20, 2013, Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly will present “Patent Pending,” the journal’s annual panel discussion on controversial constitutional law issues. “Patent Pending” is graciously co-sponsored by Morrison & Foerster LLP.

In less than two months, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, a case that hinges on whether human genes constitute patentable material. The symposium encourages discussion and debate and will educate attendees about this topic from legal, social, political, and bioethical viewpoints.

The Court’s ruling will have a significant impact on how biotechnology companies allocate resources and influence the ability of all patent holders to enforce their rights against infringers. “Patent Pending” will expand our understanding of product patents, process patents, and how we define the human body.

The evening’s discussion will be moderated by noted patent law expert Robin Feldman, Professor of Law and Director of the Law & Bioscience Project at UC Hastings. Joining Professor Feldman on this distinguished panel will be Alex Kozinski, Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Vern Norviel from Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Wesley Overson and James Mullen of Morrison & Foerster, Professor David Winickoff from UC Berkeley, and Megan Allyse from Stanford University.

Free MCLE credit is available for eligible attendees. Hors d’oeuvres, wine, beer, and other light refreshments will be served. This event is free and open to the public.

For those unable to attend, the event will be recorded and posted on the journal’s symposium page: www.hastingsconlawquarterly.org/symposium.php.

Schedule of Events:

5:00pm
Doors Open to the Public

5:10pm
Welcome Address
Jonathan August, Editor in Chief,
Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly

5:15pm
Introductory Remarks
Professor Robin Feldman, UC Hastings

5:20pm
—First Half of Panel—

  • Chief Judge Alex Kozinski. U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
  • James Mullen, Morrison & Foerster
  • Wesley Overson, Morrison & Foerster
  • Vern Norviel, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
  • Professor David Winickoff, University of California, Berkeley
  • Megan Allyse, Stanford University

6:20pm
—Break—

6:30pm
—Second Half of Panel—

7:30pm
Audience Q&A

7:55pm
Closing Remarks
Annie Moskovian, Executive Symposium Editor
Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly

Location: UC Hastings College of the Law, Louis B. Mayer Lounge, 198 McAllister Street, San Francisco, CA 94102

Contact Information: Annie Moskovian, (415) 581-8957, clq@uchastings.edu.

Share this Story

Share via Facebook
Share via TwitterShare via EmailPrint Friendly Version

Other Recent Stories/ RSS

Monday, June 17, 2013

Supreme Court Cites Professor Rory Little

Justice Alito’s dissent in Alleyne v. United States relies on a 2004 essay by Professor Rory Little.
Friday, June 07, 2013

Viewpoint: Guard Your Clients' Public Secrets

And here's the rub: On his blog, Hunter wrote about his own cases in some detail. He used the real names of clients who were acquitted, and the names of clients for whom he negotiated favorable plea bargains to lesser charges. And he acknowledged that he used the names without his clients' consent.
Friday, June 14, 2013

Viewpoint: The Death Penalty is in Limbo

Our hearts weep for the many victims of Ramirez's cruelty, and that of other perpetrators of vicious crimes. Let us punish these people properly, soundly and economically, by sentencing them to life without parole, and give up on the hollow hopes of a death penalty that is anything but.
Friday, June 14, 2013

Your Skills: Appellate Brief Writing, Before, During and After

No matter how many briefs one has written, the next one can probably be improved because the craft of brief writing is a search for perfection. But unlike perfection, if a few basic strategies are followed, more effective briefs are easily within reach.
Friday, June 14, 2013

Your Skills: Writing a Brief--Lessons From Literature

Tell the truth — lay out all of the facts, and all of the law — but tell it slant. Be artful in word choice, for every detail counts. Consider at the outset even small choices like what to name the parties — are they plaintiff and defendant, victim and prisoner, or Mr. Smith and Officer Jones? Judiciously use the passive voice to subtly downplay the negative, while preferring active voice generally, and especially in order to accentuate the positive.
Go to News Archive