UCHastings Instagram

          "I want to do something challenging. I work in the D.A.'s office right now and I'm hoping to take it to the next level." "What's it?" "Myself, I guess." -Jermaine Rodriguez, incoming #uchastings #1L
          Instagram Photo Likes hecruiz, nelson_goins, paris.hayes and 16 others like this.

          UCHastings Spotlight

          Experiential Learning

          "I don't box just to box, to stay in shape. I want to fight." - Stalacia M. Leggett '14

          Legally Speaking

          In conversation with UC Hastings Professor Joan C. Williams.

          UC Hastings Professor Joan Williams welcomes U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg for a conversation that touches on a broad range of subjects, from opera to marriage to work/life balance, doctrinal questions, and cases from the 1970's to present, including the court's role in establishing individual rights and equal protection. 

          Life @UCHastings

          "Look at the view I get every morning."

          "This is my school. These are my friends." Video by Fatemeh Shahangia '12.
          Monday, June 17, 2013

          Supreme Court Cites Professor Rory Little

          Sample alt tag.
          Rory Little, Professor of Law.

          Justice Alito’s dissent today in Alleyne v. United States relies on a 2004 essay by Professor Rory Little.

          In Apprendi v. New Jersey (1996), the Supreme Court held that facts increasing a criminal defendant’s maximum possible sentence are elements of the criminal offense that must be proved to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. But in 2002, the Court decided in Harris v. United States that Apprendi did not apply to facts that would increase a defendant’s mandatory minimum sentence. Today’s decision overrules Harris and holds that the Sixth Amendment requires a jury to find all facts that fix the penalty range of a crime.

          In The Lost History of Apprendi and the Blakely Petition for Rehearing, Professor Little noted that Apprendi was based “on an erroneous historical un­derstanding of the Framers’ views in 1790 when they wrote the 6th Amendment’s jury-trial guarantee.” Relying on this piece in his dissent today, Justice Alito suggests that if the Court is of a mind to reconsider existing precedent, it should reconsider Apprendi.

          ###

          Go to News Archive

          Share this Story

          Share via Facebook
          Share via TwitterShare via EmailPrint Friendly Version

          Other Recent Stories/ RSS

          Monday, July 20, 2015

          Q & A with Kevin Sciarani '14

          This recent grad is excelling at Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd, one of the nation's top securities litigation firms.
          Thursday, July 16, 2015

          Thinkers & Doers: July 16, 2015

          UC Hastings community members in the news and making moves, July 2, 2015 - July 16, 2015.
          Wednesday, July 15, 2015

          Bringing in the Sabbath at San Quentin

          Rising 2L and Hastings Jewish Law Students Association President Jacob Erez reports.
          Wednesday, July 15, 2015

          UC Hastings Develops Cooperative Program in Taiwan

          The EALS program hopes to strengthen legal ties between UC Hastings and the Taipei Bar Association. 
          Tuesday, July 14, 2015

          Student and Alumni Leaders Advocate for UC Hastings at the State Capitol

          The UC Hastings community unites to encourage state funding highlighting the College’s public mission.
          Go to News Archive