UCHastings Instagram

Congratulations. You've earned it! #LawSchool #SwearingIn #UCHastings
Instagram Photo Likes jfranco295, hellojrabbit, aoverhouse and 48 others like this.
Thursday, September 12, 2013

Adjunct Professor Marcia Hofmann on the iPhone's New Fingerprint ID

Hofmann looks at the legal implications of Apple's new identification system in this opinion piece in Wired, Sept. 12, 2013.

There’s a lot of talk around biometric authentication since Apple introduced its newest iPhone, which will let users unlock their device with a fingerprint. Given Apple’s industry-leading position, it’s probably not a far stretch to expect this kind of authentication to take off. Some even argue that Apple’s move is a death knell for authenticators based on what a user knows (like passwords and PIN numbers).

While there’s a great deal of discussion around the pros and cons of fingerprint authentication — from the hackability of the technique to the reliability of readers — no one’s focusing on the legal effects of moving from PINs to fingerprints.

Because the constitutional protection of the Fifth Amendment, which guarantees that “no person shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself,” may not apply when it comes to biometric-based fingerprints (things that reflect who we are) as opposed to memory-based passwords and PINs (things we need to know and remember).

Biometric authentication may make it easier for normal, everyday users to protect the data on their phones. But as wonderful as technological innovation is, it sometimes creates unintended consequences — including legal ones. If Apple’s move leads us to abandon knowledge-based authentication altogether, we risk inadvertently undermining the legal rights we currently enjoy under the Fifth Amendment.

Here’s an easy fix: give users the option to unlock their phones with a fingerprint plus something the user knows.

Read the full piece from Wired here. Follow Hofmann on Twitter at @marciahofmann

 

Go to News Archive

Share this Story

Share via Facebook
Share via TwitterShare via EmailPrint Friendly Version

Other Recent Stories/ RSS

Wednesday, December 10, 2014

Finding Trolls Where They Hide

Professor Robin Feldman proposes new approach to regulation of patent ownership information
Friday, December 05, 2014

Justice Marvin and Jane Baxter Endowment for Moot Court Established

“Everything I’ve had the privilege to do in public service is because of UC Hastings,” said Justice Baxter, “the finest law school in America.”
Thursday, December 04, 2014

Should Immigration Status Play Any Role in the Courtroom?

The UC Hastings Appellate Project weighs in on excluding litigant immigration status during voir dire.
Thursday, December 04, 2014

Thinkers & Doers: December 4, 2014

UC Hastings community members in the news and making moves November 26 - December 4, 2014.
Monday, November 24, 2014

Hastings Law Journal and UC Berkeley California Constitution Center Launch SCOCABlog

Ongoing coverage of the California Supreme Court will include analysis from faculty and practitioners around the state.
Go to News Archive