UCHastings Instagram

          #Repost Chancellor & Dean @frankhwu
          Instagram Photo Likes pkrummenacher, esalg_002, kmatayoshi and 10 others like this.
          Thursday, November 07, 2013

          Professors Dodson, Little Add Context and Clarity to Pending Supreme Court Cases via SCOTUSBlog Commentary

          SCOTUSBlog is the most widely-read and relied upon resource for all things related to the US Supreme Court.

          With the new Supreme Court term well under way, UC Hastings Professors are chiming in to add context and clarity to some of the Court’s early cases for SCOTUSBlog, the most widely-read and trusted resource about the US Supreme Court.

          Scott DodsonProfessor Scott Dodson offered a pre-argument summary in Sprint Communications, Inc. v. Jacobs, the day before oral arguments were heard at the Court, and then a post-argument summary of how the litigants presented their positions. "The argument seemed more one-sided than a two-headed penny," Dodson wrote. "Counsel for petitioner Sprint faced only fifteen questions, while counsel for respondent IUB faced around forty. Further, the Justices took up only seventy-seven transcript lines of Sprint’s 456 total but a whopping 217 of the IUB’s 514. Look for a unanimous reversal from the Court in short order," he predicted.

          Rory LittleProfessor Rory Little has offered a similar preview for Fernandez v. California, a criminal procedure case garnering significant attention in the press. You can read his complete preview here.

          Professor Little also offered an opinion analysis for Burt v. Titlow, the first full criminal law case of the new term. "Titlow presented various follow-on questions after two 2012 decisions, which extended ineffective assistance of counsel doctrine to the plea bargaining context," Little wrote. "But the Court’s nine-to-zero ruling (with Justice Sotomayor filing a separate concurrence and Justice Ginsburg concurring only in the judgment) did not resolve most of those follow-up questions. Instead, the Court was plainly more concerned about the Sixth Circuit’s failure to apply the 'doubly deferential' standards of federal habeas corpus law."

          ##

          Go to News Archive

          Share this Story

          Share via Facebook
          Share via TwitterShare via EmailPrint Friendly Version

          Other Recent Stories/ RSS

          Friday, August 28, 2015

          Margie Lariviere ‘94 Talks Insurance and the Secret to Happiness

          After spending over 20 years working in insurance law, Margie Lariviere ’94 is now General Counsel at State Fund
          Wednesday, August 26, 2015

          Magazine Preview: Feeding China's Growth With U.S. Capital

          Despite the Chinese market correction, William Uchimoto '81 sees prosperity in a new stock exchange. By Vanessa Hua. 
          Tuesday, August 25, 2015

          From Humble Beginnings to Supreme Court Justice, Marvin Baxter ’66 Shares Insights in Commemorative Volumes

          Students will now be able to read the Justice's opinions during his time at the highest court of the state.
          Friday, August 21, 2015

          Thinkers & Doers: August 21, 2015

          UC Hastings community members in the news and making moves, August 1, 2015 - August 21, 2015.
          Thursday, August 20, 2015

          Opening Tech’s Doors to Women of Color

          A partnership between UC Hastings’ Startup Legal Garage and the pioneering nonprofit Black Girls Code is a win-win for both.
          Go to News Archive