Friday, August 01, 2014

          Environmental Justice Lessons From California to Haiti

          Special post by Rising 3L Nancy Schneider, a Spring 2014 Environmental Law Clinic student placed at The Center on Race, Poverty & the Environment.
          Rising 3L Nancy Schneider

          Rising 3L Nancy Schneider

          This spring as a Law Clerk at the Center on Race, Poverty & the Environment, I saw two extraordinary movements at work.

          I glimpsed the daily workings of the Environmental Justice movement in California—much of my work focused on fracking, one of California's many environmental justice hurdles. I also had the opportunity to travel to Haiti and work with communities living near possible gold mining sites, organizing to educate themselves on the risks of gold mining and their rights as citizens to decide whether to permit the sites. While in Haiti, I noticed a dismaying similarity between California's treatment of its most vulnerable communities, and the persistent global habit of irresponsible natural resource extraction.

          In Haiti there is a moratorium on granting new metal mining permits. The country is updating its mining code to balance attractiveness to foreign investment against the benefits needed to make mining worthwhile. A much needed update as the former code was simultaneously confusing for investors and not protective of the people. However, it's anticipated that even the new code may not go far enough and fail to include key protections needed to properly protect the people and the environment.

          It occurred to me that in California we're not doing much better. Senate Bill 4, California's new fracking law, explicitly permits fossil fuel extraction through well stimulation, even before the risks of the practice are fully understood. Much of the actual environmental and community protections are left to future regulation.

          In both cases, the majority of the benefits of natural resource exploitation will flow out of the community where the extraction takes place, but the costs will remain. People in heavily fracked communities in California face an array of health problems - from respiratory problems to rare cancers. They live next door to pits of wastewater, deal with increased truck traffic, dust, and noise; and they're exposed to air pollution, water pollution, and increased risk of seismic activity. Similarly, as shown in mining communities worldwide, the social and environmental effects of open pit gold mining are acute and lasting.

          This is especially problematic because these coveted resources are often located in areas occupied by the most vulnerable portions of the population. This may simply be a function of geography, or it could be that it's easier to move hundreds of families off of an ore deposit in Haiti than in the United States. Either way, the laws are getting it backwards. Lawmakers, in collaboration with the communities they represent, should identify a positive social and environmental outcome and work backwards.

          Laws that prioritize investment and delay specific regulation fail to provide for the possibility that the benefits will never outweigh the costs. Ignoring the true cost of natural resource extraction is shortsighted policy-making. This has been true throughout the decades of mineral resource sector growth in developing countries, and it is still true in California.

          ###

          This piece was originally published by the Center on Race, Poverty & the Environment on their website at www.crpe-ej.org

          Go to News Archive

          Share this Story

          Share via Facebook
          Share via TwitterShare via EmailPrint Friendly Version

          Other Recent Stories/ RSS

          Thursday, September 22, 2016

          Mascot Tryouts?

          After 138 years of teaching law and producing first-class legal scholarship, we began to wonder if perhaps we are just a little too focused. Maybe we should look a little more like other institutions, with athletics programs and school mascots?
          Thursday, September 22, 2016

          Race and Policing Panel at UC Hastings

          Panel includes San Francisco Public Defender Jeff Adachi, SFPD Interim Chief Toney Chaplin, UC Berkeley Prof. Nikki Jones, Former Director of the DOJ’s Community Service Relations Service Grande Lum, Alameda County District Attorney Nancy O’Malley, and UC Hastings Prof. Hadar Aviram.
          Wednesday, September 21, 2016

          Why Mozilla’s Head of Social Strategy Is Getting a Law Degree at UC Hastings

          Maura Tuohy enrolled in the MSL for Business and Technology Professionals to help forge an ethical future for tech.
          Wednesday, September 21, 2016

          Selected Faculty Publications Since 2015

          UC Hastings faculty consistently produce high-profile, diverse, and influential scholarship.
          Tuesday, September 20, 2016

          Fighting Unjust Driver’s License Suspensions

          As a consumer protection attorney at Bay Area Legal Aid, Claire Johnson Raba ‘10 upholds the rights of low-income consumers and drivers in California.
          Go to News Archive