Tuesday, February 17, 2015

          Shining Light on Dark Money in Campaign Finance

          Ann Ravel ’74 has begun her one-year tenure as Chair of the Federal Election Commission.

          Sample alt tag.

          The world of campaign finance has become ever more complex since the Federal Election Commission (FEC) was established in 1975 following the Watergate scandal.

          Ann Ravel ’74, who has taken the reins as Chair of the FEC for 2015, is a fierce advocate for making the murky universe of “dark money” in U.S. elections more transparent.

          Ravel has dedicated her career to public service. Prior to her appointment to the FEC in 2013, Ravel served as Chair of the California Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) where, according to her official biography, she oversaw state campaign finance regulation. Before joining the FPPC, she was the Deputy Assistant Attorney General for Torts and Consumer Litigation at the U.S. Department of Justice. She also served for more than a decade as County Counsel for Santa Clara County after working as a staff lawyer there for many years.

          In her new role, Ravel has her work cut out for her. Although the FEC is an independent regulatory agency charged with, among other things, enforcing the limits and prohibitions on contributions, two of the six FEC commissioners are Democrats, including Ravel, one is Independent, and the other three are Republicans—a split that leads to frequent deadlocks and few investigations. As Ravel noted in an op-ed that appeared in the NY Times last year, “the FEC is failing in its job to ensure that voters know who is behind the rapidly proliferating political advertisements made possible by this extraordinary spending.”

          “[Dark money] is a problem for those on the Democratic side as well as the Republican side. It’s not a partisan question for me,” Ravel said in a recent Center for Public Integrity article. In addition to advocating for greater transparency in campaign donations, Ravel is also outspoken about her desire for the FEC to study the increasingly important role of web-based communications in political campaigns. Although meaningful reform is unlikely given the political climate within the FEC and in Congress, she is using her bully pulpit as FEC Chair to raise awareness about both issues outside of Washington, D.C. and hopes to achieve incremental change during her tenure. 

          She is also partnering with UC Hastings’ Institute for Innovation Law to create a program, the "Future of Technology and Democracy: How Tech is Transforming Voting, Elections and Politics," aimed at understanding the changes in technology and their impact on political campaigns and increasing civic engagement.

          Go to News Archive

          Share this Story

          Share via Facebook
          Share via TwitterShare via EmailPrint Friendly Version

          Other Recent Stories/ RSS

          Tuesday, September 19, 2017

          3L Griffin Estes advocates for the marginalized people of San Francisco

          The Managing Director of the Brennan Award-winning Hastings Homeless Legal Services discusses the critical skills needed to pursue a career in public interest and social justice.
          Monday, September 18, 2017

          Student Group Champions Reproductive Justice

          Members of the UC Hastings chapter of If/When/How are making a difference through lobbying, fundraising and career development.
          Friday, September 15, 2017

          The Slants - Live from UC Hastings

          2L Jeremy Chan, president of APALSA, reflects on how the student organization partnered with SFIPLA to bring the headline-making band to UC Hastings to perform and discuss their U.S. Supreme Court victory.
          Wednesday, September 13, 2017

          Community Connections

          La Raza Law Students Association works for diversity in the classroom and the courtroom.
          Monday, September 11, 2017

          Coping With Concentration- Tim Greaney researches regulatory measures to combat increasing healthcare costs for Health Affairs

          Professor Greaney’s commentary suggests that regulations should target the real culprits, providers with market power and the ability to stifle competition.
          Go to News Archive