Thursday, July 09, 2015

          In Kimble v. Marvel, Supreme Court Follows Logic Encouraged by Professors Feldman and Armitage

          Sample alt tag.

          The UC Hastings Institute for Innovation Law followed Kimble v. Marvel Enterprises from the beginning.

          By contributing an amicus curiae brief, offering public commentary, and publishing related scholarship, the work of the Institute helped shape arguments in the case. And the Supreme Court’s decision closely follows the logic of the brief submitted by Professors Robin Feldman and Alice Armitage.

          The Court upheld a ban in Kimble on agreements to pay royalties tied to the post-expiration use of a patent. Mirroring the language the professors used in their amicus brief, the Court said that “allowing even a single company to restrict its use of an expired or invalid patent” is against the spirit of the Patent Act, where protected inventions must eventually flow into the public domain. The Court also agreed with the professors’ argument that patent law is not antitrust and should not be treated as such.

          The language referring to the detrimental restraint of a “single company” or “one potential innovator” reflected academic articles published by Professor Feldman. In fact, briefs submitted by both the petitioners and the respondents cited Professor Feldman’s 2003 article, “The Insufficiency of Antitrust Analysis for Patent Misuse,” published in the Hastings Law Journal.

          “This historic decision is essential for the integrity of the patent system,” said Professor Feldman. “The Court confirmed that all good things must come to an end, and that includes patents.”

          In addition to their influential amicus brief and cited publications, faculty and staff at the Institute for Innovation Law made further contributions to the discussion around the case. On the day of oral arguments, Professors Feldman and Armitage, along with Institute Research Fellow Evan Frondorf, contributed an op-ed to the Daily Journal explaining the case. Armitage and Frondorf followed up with another Daily Journal piece unpacking the decision once the opinion was handed down.

          The Institute for Innovation Law

          The Institute for Innovation Law (Institute) is a public interest academic center at UC Hastings. The Institute engages in academic research and education to encourage innovation through the practice and development of law and policy. The Institute’s mission is to identify and promote the tools, knowledge, and skills needed to encourage innovation through the practice and development of law and policy.

          Dedicated to promoting Data-Driven Law-Making, the Institute seeks to empower regulators to make informed decisions using reliable and objective analysis. Importantly, the Institute is developing a set of resources, skills, and knowledge applicable to other areas of the law. Research on legal issues that limit entrepreneurship is one part of a purpose driven initiative to study Data Driven Law Making. The Data Driven Law Making initiative is part of a greater effort by the Institute to support all aspects of innovation, legal and technical, at the intersection of the law and technology.

          Go to News Archive

          Share this Story

          Share via Facebook
          Share via TwitterShare via EmailPrint Friendly Version

          Other Recent Stories/ RSS

          Wednesday, February 22, 2017

          ‘Always look for the helpers’: Meet 1L Michelle Human, AKA Miss Honey, Professional Faerie

          This little girl looked at me and she said, you're a flower fairy right? I said yes, I'm a flower fairy. She said, okay I have a wish, I wish that the garden in front of my house in Syria, I wish that the flowers could grow there again because right now there's fire and the ground is ash. I wish that we lived in a world where there's no bombs or bullets or fires, and that the earth was reminded how to grow flowers again.
          Tuesday, February 07, 2017

          Civil Rights Lawyer Zahra Billoo ’09 Is Fighting President Trump’s “Travel Ban”

          As leader of a Council on American-Islamic Relations chapter, she is standing up for the rights of Muslim Americans in court and in the media.
          Monday, February 06, 2017

          Hadar Aviram assumes the presidency of the Western Society of Criminology

          Congratulations to UC Hastings Professor Hadar Aviram, who is set to begin her term as the president of the Western Society of Criminology.
          Wednesday, February 01, 2017

          Statement from Dean Faigman: Deans Letter to California Supreme Court re California Bar Exam

          Today a group of 20 deans of ABA-accredited California law schools submitted a letter to the California Supreme Court, calling upon it to “exercise its legal jurisdiction over the California State Bar to adjust its scoring methods to bring them in line with the nation’s at large.”
          Wednesday, February 01, 2017

          Thinkers & Doers: January 2017

          THE RESISTANCE -- Haiku for Law Students -- Judge Gorsuch’s jurisprudence -- A Populist Crusade Against Corporate Greed -- THE MOST READ HBR ARTICLE OF ALL TIME -- Mom bias at work -- Will Trump’s refugee "ban" survive? -- Alumni recording artists -- and much more
          Go to News Archive