Thursday, July 07, 2016

          Professor Feldman Collaborates on Open Letter Urging Ethical Norms in IP Scholarship

          “One must be mindful of the delicate pull of friends with money,” state the authors.
          Sample alt tag.
          Professor Robin Feldman testifying before House Committee on Energy & Commerce.

          Concerned about the increasing influx of corporate and private funding into empirical and policy research, four prominent intellectual property scholars – including UC Hastings Law Professor Robin Feldman – have published an open letter to the legal academy establishing a set of ethical norms for legal scholarship in their field.

          In addition to Feldman, the “Open Letter on Ethical Norms in Intellectual Property Scholarship,” published in the Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, is co-authored by Stanford Law School Professor Mark Lemley, Jonathan Masur of the University of Chicago Law School and Arti Rai of Duke University School of Law. More than 40 additional scholars in the intellectual property field from law schools all over the country have already pledged to conform their scholarship to these ethical principles, with their names listed at the end of the article.

          “One must be mindful of the delicate pull of friends with money,” state the authors. At the same time as more IP scholars are engaging in policy advocacy, writing amicus briefs, and practicing law, as well as engaging in ever-more complex and expensive empirical research, outside corporate and private financial support for IP scholars and their research has been dramatically increasing. As it has in other fields where such support is common, the creation of ethical standards related to outside financial support has lagged well behind. Noting that several major studies that in other academic fields such as science and medicine have confirmed that results of research are substantially affected by sponsorships and gifts even when researchers attempt to mitigate that influence the authors developed principles for themselves and their colleagues to follow to avoid similar insidious influence.

          The letter, written with “aspirations of reaching the highest ethical norms possible for our field,” promotes three related objectives. It says:

          “The first is transparency: members of the academic community should disclose any monetary or related inducements that might have the potential to influence scholarly research or create the perception that scholarly research has been unduly influenced. The second is to reduce the potential for overt or subconscious bias to affect scholarly research. Members of the academic community should seek wherever possible to minimize or eliminate outside influences that might inject bias or the appearance of bias into research. The third is to facilitate replicability and examination of existing work by requiring, to the fullest extent possible, the disclosure of the data underlying it.”

          The authors provide additional detailed norms for the IP field, and pledge to follow them themselves. These include:

          • Disclosure of funding sources for research projects, relevant consulting and representation agreements, and funding for related institutions
          • Refusal to engage in quid pro quo arrangements or accept funding where prior approval of findings is required
          • Disclosure of underlying data for purposes of research replication
          • Working with a spirit of collegiality and open inquiry
          • Striving for diverse funding sources for institutions and identification of donors
          • Promotion of continued development and adoption of ethical norms in intellectual property scholarship

          The authors note that these standards are long overdue by academic standards and critical for the continued integrity of the field. “Similar norms have been widely adopted throughout the life sciences and social sciences, in some cases by rule of the governing professional organizations or academic publishers,” they state. “We believe that legal scholars should abide by norms that are at least as stringent with respect to transparency and avoiding bias.” A list of the 40 signatories to the letter is available in the published working paper at SSRN.

          Go to News Archive

          Share this Story

          Share via Facebook
          Share via TwitterShare via EmailPrint Friendly Version

          Other Recent Stories/ RSS

          Thursday, October 19, 2017

          UC Hastings Law Receives $1 Million Gift from Shanin Specter

          Gift from renowned trial attorney will be used to build the new “Shanin Specter Courtroom” and to support multiple areas within the College.
          Tuesday, October 17, 2017

          How a decade of high-flying, high-stakes government jobs led 3L Christa Hall to law school at UC Hastings

          She's protected teams and aircraft on high-risk missions around the world, served as associate director and trip manager for President Barack Obama, and helped deal with crises like cyberhacks and the Ebola epidemic. Now she's preparing for a new way to serve.
          Thursday, October 05, 2017

          When a monkey takes a selfie, who owns the copyright?

          Andrew Dhuey '92 and the infamous “Monkey Selfie” case.
          Wednesday, October 04, 2017

          Professor Dave Owen receives 2017 Rutter Award for Teaching Excellence

          When his parents denied access to all TV except PBS wildlife specials, it sparked a life-long environmental law interest in our “infectiously enthusiastic” professor.
          Tuesday, October 03, 2017

          Thinkers & Doers: September 2017

          National Law Journal’s 2017 Winning Litigators -- Uber’s “Hell” program -- Foie gras off the menu in CA -- Comments on the Hash Lab Murder Case -- Pao Effect fighting the bamboo ceiling -- Top 10 LLM Program in California -- New neighborhood hotspots -- and much more
          Go to News Archive